Pick two answers to the LAQ homework. Use the markscheme to mark these. Post your mark and a suggestion on how the person could improve their work in the comments section below here. Remember to include the person's name in your advice!
Jacob would get a level one but around 2 marks as he didn't understand the question but covered some key points. He aparently thought it had water in, although the question clearly stated that it was a hydrocarbon..he can't help it:/
Lauren: 5 marks We gave lauren 5 marks for good understanding, detailed description and clear explanation. Good use of key terms, although could use a wider range of vocabulary. Also, she had written a LOT and might struggle to fit this in during an exam.
Adam: 2 marks We gave Adam 2 marks because he showed understanding of the question and described a difference between the two molecules, as the question stated. However, the explanation was non-exitsant and key terms were limited. But well done :)
Dear Alex, Good try! i would give you 5 marks out of 6, because you have clearly understood the question. You could have written more specialist terms. :)
Dear Spohie, I would give you 4 out of 6, because you have shown that you can correctly use specialist terms, and construct your explaination clearly and logically. In future it is important to watch your grammar, and also expand your answer slightly.
Dear Adam, In light of reading your views on the LAQ (Long Answer Question)we have concluded that you have achieved a level 1. This is because you have not included enough details and have also not explained the roles of intermolecular forces therefore you need to work on: Understanding the question to be able to answer all that is required. Also you need to show a clearer understanding of the subject.
Yours sincerely, Matthew P Megan M Beatriz da S :)
Sophie :S
ReplyDelete4 marks
Intermollecular bonds not clearly explained, but relevant information is included in answer
Tom - 4 marks, To improve you need to explain the roles of intermolecular forces.
ReplyDeleteMolly - 2/3 marks, To improve you need to explain why a longer chain means that the molecule has a higher boiling point
Stuart: 3 marks. More detail on intermolecular force thing. Improve grammar and more specialist terms
ReplyDeleteJacob would get a level one but around 2 marks as he didn't understand the question but covered some key points.
ReplyDeleteHe aparently thought it had water in, although the question clearly stated that it was a hydrocarbon..he can't help it:/
Lauren: 5 marks
ReplyDeleteWe gave lauren 5 marks for good understanding, detailed description and clear explanation. Good use of key terms, although could use a wider range of vocabulary. Also, she had written a LOT and might struggle to fit this in during an exam.
Adam: 2 marks
We gave Adam 2 marks because he showed understanding of the question and described a difference between the two molecules, as the question stated. However, the explanation was non-exitsant and key terms were limited. But well done :)
Lauren: 6/6 Really good however a little bit repetitive
ReplyDeleteAdam: 1/6 Good point add more detail (lots of detail)
: ) >:3
Kayleigh-May :) got 3 marks Level 2 next time make sure you talk about the intermoleculer forces and explain in more detail
ReplyDeleteJacob got 2 marks Level 1 next time mabye use a few specailist terms and IMPROVE GRAMMER!! try to go into some detail.
Adam Phipps - 2-3 marks as it fulfills almost all of "Level 2" but not quite all of them.
ReplyDeleteMatthew Wright - 5 marks, because it explains most things required for level 3, but fails to mention intermolecular forces. BLAM
Adam:- level one, 2 marks because he covers that the two molecules will differ but lacks key explanation
ReplyDeletesorrryyyyyyyy:( good try buddy!
Uncle Tom :): very good answer with good detail and understanding, to improve you could use more specialist terms :)
ReplyDeleteMarks: 5 :)
Dear Alex,
ReplyDeleteGood try!
i would give you 5 marks out of 6, because you have clearly understood the question.
You could have written more specialist terms. :)
Dear Spohie,
I would give you 4 out of 6, because you have shown that you can correctly use specialist terms, and construct your explaination clearly and logically. In future it is important to watch your grammar, and also expand your answer slightly.
Dear Adam,
ReplyDeleteIn light of reading your views on the LAQ (Long Answer Question)we have concluded that you have achieved a level 1. This is because you have not included enough details and have also not explained the roles of intermolecular forces therefore you need to work on:
Understanding the question to be able to answer all that is required.
Also you need to show a clearer understanding of the subject.
Yours sincerely,
Matthew P
Megan M
Beatriz da S
:)
George: 3 marks. Talk about the bonds. Improve grammar. Use relevant information
ReplyDeleteMatthew, Good detail but no specialist terms.
ReplyDelete5 marks
tom
ReplyDelete4 marks
relevant information included in the answer, however intermollecular bonds not clearly explained